<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>moar internets &#187; scientology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jacquelineurick.com/category/scientology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jacquelineurick.com</link>
	<description>the musings of Jacqueline Urick</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 06:34:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Scientology Taking Boston (not so) Anonymous to Court</title>
		<link>http://www.jacquelineurick.com/2008/04/28/scientology-takes-boston-anonymous-to-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jacquelineurick.com/2008/04/28/scientology-takes-boston-anonymous-to-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 01:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jacque Urick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[scientology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anonymous]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacquelineurick.com/?p=52</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Several attorneys interviewed by Lawyers Weekly are questioning the validity of the charges against Housh. &#8220;There is no way this case belongs in a criminal courtroom,&#8221; says one defense lawyer who requested anonymity of the do-not-quote-me kind. &#8220;I&#8217;m glad I don&#8217;t have to figure out how to get rid of it, but this case ought [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jacquelineurick.com%2F2008%2F04%2F28%2Fscientology-takes-boston-anonymous-to-court%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jacquelineurick.com%2F2008%2F04%2F28%2Fscientology-takes-boston-anonymous-to-court%2F&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<blockquote><p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;">Several attorneys interviewed by Lawyers Weekly are questioning the validity of the charges against Housh. </span></span></span><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;">&#8220;There is no way this case belongs in a criminal courtroom,&#8221; says one defense lawyer who requested anonymity of the do-not-quote-me kind. &#8220;I&#8217;m glad I don&#8217;t have to figure out how to get rid of it, but this case ought to be dismissed.&#8221; </span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;">As Dlott tries to arrive at such a result, he acknowledges that the new charge has already affected Housh&#8217;s probation status in federal court. </span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;">&#8220;The day they filed this complaint was scheduled to be the last day of his probation on a federal conviction he had for pirating software,&#8221; Dlott explains. &#8220;He served three months [in prison] and was on his last day of probation when they filed the complaint, but as a result of this, the federal probation has been extended.&#8221; -<a title="Scientology Case Headed to BMC" href="http://www.masslaw.com/042808news.cfm" target="_blank"> </a></span></span></span><a title="Scientology Case Headed to BMC" href="http://www.masslaw.com/042808news.cfm" target="_blank">Scientology Case Headed to BMC</a></p></blockquote>
<p>Doing search marketing for law firms, I happen to run across a lot of legal-related articles on the Internet. This one in particular piqued my interest. I had read on another blog (that I don&#8217;t remember the URL of ) that the Church of Scientology had filed some complaints against &#8220;outed&#8221; Anonymous protesters. I have to admit I do have a fascination with this particular crusade of Anon&#8217;s.</p>
<p>I think it is interesting to look at the legal aspects of Anonymous&#8217; &#8220;War&#8221;. It is really unfortunate that Gregg Housh did the right thing and registered the protest, only to be charged. It is also unfortunate that this ridiculous charge is messing with the terms of his probation. While I don&#8217;t agree with pirating, I do find it somewhat vindictive to file a complaint with Scientology&#8217;s attorney knowing it would affect Mr. Housh&#8217;s probation. It is nothing but litigious bullying on the part of the &#8220;church&#8221; in my opinion. Nothing terrible happened during these protests. By all accounts it has been peaceful demonstrations in Boston. Why does Scientology feel that they can stifle the 1st Amendment rights of people? I don&#8217;t think a demonstration or protest is violating their 2nd Amendment right at all.</p>
<p>I hope his fellow Boston Anon steps up to the plate and helps to pay for some of the poor guy&#8217;s legal fees. He did make it possible for them to legally protest after all.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save"><img src="http://www.jacquelineurick.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jacquelineurick.com/2008/04/28/scientology-takes-boston-anonymous-to-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More CoS PPC</title>
		<link>http://www.jacquelineurick.com/2008/03/30/more-cos-ppc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jacquelineurick.com/2008/03/30/more-cos-ppc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 19:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jacque Urick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scientology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacquelineurick.com/2008/03/30/more-cos-ppc/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I really don&#8217;t know why I&#8217;m finding these Church of Scientology ads so amusing. At least the placement of this one makes more sense. I love the Britney Spears ringtones ad here too. Like if all else fails, I can at least answer my phone to &#8220;Oops, I did it again&#8221;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jacquelineurick.com%2F2008%2F03%2F30%2Fmore-cos-ppc%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jacquelineurick.com%2F2008%2F03%2F30%2Fmore-cos-ppc%2F&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>I really don&#8217;t know why I&#8217;m finding these Church of Scientology ads so amusing. At least the placement of this one makes more sense.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.jacquelineurick.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/scientology_facts.jpg" alt="Get the facts about Scientology" /></p>
<p>I love the Britney Spears ringtones ad here too. Like if all else fails, I can at least answer my phone to &#8220;Oops, I did it again&#8221;.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save"><img src="http://www.jacquelineurick.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jacquelineurick.com/2008/03/30/more-cos-ppc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Church of Scientology Needs to LRN2PPC</title>
		<link>http://www.jacquelineurick.com/2008/03/28/church-of-scientology-needs-to-lrn2ppc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jacquelineurick.com/2008/03/28/church-of-scientology-needs-to-lrn2ppc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 03:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jacque Urick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scientology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacquelineurick.com/2008/03/28/church-of-scientology-needs-to-lrn2ppc/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I saw a couple blog posts about how the Church of Scientology has begun an AdWords campaign to promote their newly redesigned video channel website. It is a pretty fancy new website. That said, they really need to learn to PPC. Why are they buying &#8220;scientology&#8221; and &#8220;church of scientology&#8221;? They are already ranking for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jacquelineurick.com%2F2008%2F03%2F28%2Fchurch-of-scientology-needs-to-lrn2ppc%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jacquelineurick.com%2F2008%2F03%2F28%2Fchurch-of-scientology-needs-to-lrn2ppc%2F&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>I saw a couple blog posts about how the Church of Scientology has begun an AdWords campaign to promote their newly redesigned video channel website. It is a pretty fancy new website.</p>
<p>That said, they really need to learn to PPC. Why are they buying &#8220;scientology&#8221; and &#8220;church of scientology&#8221;? They are already ranking for those terms!</p>
<p><img src="http://www.jacquelineurick.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/churchofscientology2.jpg" alt="Church of Scientology Canonical Issues" /></p>
<p>Also, my friends at the CoS&#8230; the word of today is canonical. I don&#8217;t know why you guys are maintaining that old site along with the new video site. I see the link there in your video channel and I don&#8217;t get it. The branding, tone, etc is really disjointed.</p>
<p>As far as I could tell they were not buying money terms like &#8220;tom cruise&#8221;, &#8220;xenu&#8221;,  &#8220;$cientology&#8221; or &#8220;chanology&#8221; the latter being the name of sorts for the Anonymous movement. If you&#8217;re going to buy terms to defend your good name &#8211; know your enemies!</p>
<p><img src="http://www.jacquelineurick.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/cientolgynoads.jpg" alt="$cientology - No Ads there!" /></p>
<p><img src="http://www.jacquelineurick.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/chanology.jpg" alt="Chanology - Here would be a good place to make an argument, Scientology!" /></p>
<p>I guess one of the more curious discovery while looking to see who was bidding on what on the YouTubes was the fact that Medifast is buying on this term too? They are all freaking over YouTube.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.jacquelineurick.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/whyismedifastbuyingscientol.jpg" alt="Medifast &amp; Scientology" /></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know who is doing their online marketing but I&#8217;ve noticed that they have been really aggressive lately. I see Medifast EVERYWHERE now.  I really found this ad highly amusing juxtaposed with the Anonymous / Scientology content. Are they saying the 4chan anon kids are fat (hey /b/ does this post make my ass look fat? in before tits or GTFO)? Or the Scientologists or both? I guess we as humans can all find a commonality in our weird body-image issues. Lets all hold hands and slurp a ready-to-drink soy-shake. Maybe L Ron Hubbard should have started a diet-related cult instead.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save"><img src="http://www.jacquelineurick.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jacquelineurick.com/2008/03/28/church-of-scientology-needs-to-lrn2ppc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

